Brandilite AEO audit / app system

Three views. One evidence trail.

Move from portfolio-level visibility, to one captured answer, to the source and technical conditions behind it. The screens below use a fixed sample dataset so the workflow can be reviewed before live product data exists.

AI answer visibility

See where your brand appears, which sources are cited and where competitors take the answer.

Answer presence18 / 3060% of eligible captured answers
First-party citation coverage7 / 3023% cite a verified first-party URL
Shortlist inclusion4 / 1233% of eligible commercial answers

Visibility by AI surface · selected topic clusters

Scroll horizontally to view all columns on small screens.

Topic clusterChatGPTClaudeGeminiPerplexityCopilotGrok
Project planningPresentPresentPresentAbsentNot checkedNo answer
Client approvalsPresentAbsentPresentPresentAbsentNo answer
Workflow automationPresentPresentAbsentNo answerPresentNot checked
Team reportingAbsentNo answerPresentPresentNot checkedAbsent

Answer presence over time

2 Aug10%10%
8 Aug23%23%
14 Aug35%35%
20 Aug40%40%
26 Aug52%52%
31 Aug60%60%
View chart values
  • 2 Aug: 10%
  • 8 Aug: 23%
  • 14 Aug: 35%
  • 20 Aug: 40%
  • 26 Aug: 52%
  • 31 Aug: 60%

First-party citation coverage

23%
Cited7 of 307
Mentioned, no citation11 of 3011
No first-party citation12 of 3012

Competitors appearing instead

Competitor A88
Competitor B66
Competitor C44
Competitor D33
Highest-impact gap

Shortlist answers do not reference a first-party proof page.

Strengthen the comparison pathway with verifiable integration and workflow evidence.

View gap details

Affected sample paths: the integration page, comparison page and case-study proof. Acceptance check: a named first-party URL is present in rendered HTML and appears in a repeat observation.

Fixed review period: 2–31 Aug 2026 · Last checked 31 Aug 2026, 08:15 BST

Interface preview with sample data. It demonstrates the audit workflow, not a client result.

Prompt & answer inspector

Compare one commercial question across AI answers, entities and cited sources.

Which project-management tools fit a 20-person agency that needs client approvals and Slack integration?
Comparison20-person agencyUnited KingdomWorkflow fit

Scroll horizontally to view all columns on small screens.

AI surfaceAnswer capturedBrand presentPositionFirst-party citationSources
ChatGPTYesPresentLeadCited4
ClaudeYesPresentShortlistCited3
GeminiYesUnclearMentionNot cited2
PerplexityYesPresentShortlistCited4
CopilotIncompleteAbsentNot presentNo citations0
GrokIncompleteUnclearMentionNot cited1

Captured answer · ChatGPT

Captured 31 Aug 2026, 09:41 BST · fixed sample response

For an agency that needs client approvals and Slack integration, YourBrand is presented alongside Competitor A and Competitor B. The answer cites a first-party product page and three independent sources.

  • YourBrand — lead recommendation
  • Competitor A — approval workflows
  • Competitor B — team reporting

Evidence trace

Matched brand entities

  • YourBrand 3/6
  • Feature entity 4/6
  • Integration entity 3/6

Competitors appearing

  • Competitor A 5/6
  • Competitor B 4/6
  • Competitor C 3/6

Cited sources

  • First-party product page 3
  • Independent review 4
  • Editorial source 3

Finding

Clearly present in 3 of 6 answers, unclear in 2, and absent in 1. It leads or is shortlisted on 3 surfaces.

Top opportunity

Gemini, Copilot and Grok lack a verified first-party citation in this fixed sample.

Recommended action

Add verifiable Slack-integration and client-approval evidence to the comparison pathway.

Fixed review period: 2–31 Aug 2026 · Captured 31 Aug 2026, 09:41 BST

Interface preview with sample data. It demonstrates the audit workflow, not a client result.

AI source & technical readiness

Check whether priority pages can be reached, understood and used as evidence.

Pages checked12 / 12100% of recorded scope
Crawler-accessible pages9 / 12Successful response and not blocked
Evidence-ready pages6 / 12Pass the stated evidence checks
Critical blockers3Unique high-priority issues

Priority page audit

Scroll horizontally to view all columns on small screens.

PageHTTPIndexabilityAI crawler accessEvidence signalObserved citationNext action
/product200 OKIndexableAccessibleEvidence foundCitation observedMonitor
/integrations/slack200 OKIndexableBlockedEvidence missingNot observedRestore access
/compare301 RedirectCanonical elsewhereAccessibleEvidence missingNot observedInspect redirect target; add evidence to canonical destination
/case-studies200 OKIndexableAccessibleEvidence foundCitation observedMonitor
/pricing200 OKNoindexAccessibleEvidence missingNot observedReview indexation
/blog/ai-visibility200 OKIndexableAccessibleEvidence foundNot observedImprove citations

Request-capable crawler access

Access status does not guarantee ingestion, answer inclusion or citation.

Crawlerrobots.txtHTTP accessRendered contentLast checked
OAI-SearchBotAllowedAccessiblePartial08:15 BST
GPTBotBlockedBlockedN/A08:15 BST
ClaudeBotAllowedAccessiblePartial08:14 BST
PerplexityBotAllowedAccessiblePartial08:13 BST
GooglebotAllowedAccessibleFull08:10 BST
BingbotAllowedAccessibleFull08:09 BST

AI training-use controls

Google-Extended: Allowed in robots.txt. This is a product-control token, not a request-capable crawler, so no HTTP-access or rendered-content result is assigned.

Source coverage supporting evidence

First-party6 of 126
Documentation4 of 124
Independent review3 of 123
Editorial3 of 123
Community2 of 122
Data source2 of 122

Fixed audit timestamp: 31 Aug 2026, 08:15 BST

Interface preview with sample data. It demonstrates the audit workflow, not a client result.